It's hard to fault Highguard for giving the internet the silent treatment—wouldn't you?

Few actually expected last year's Game Awards to close with anything as earth-shattering as Half-Life 3, but if that kind of huge announcement were going to happen during the show, that's when it would. Instead, Geoff Keighley cued up a trailer for an unknown hero shooter called Highguard. It didn't go great.

The social media reaction was instantly hostile. Highguard was received as a 'one more thing' trespasser that had claimed an unearned seat of honor, although its developer did not pay for the slot as many assumed. The reveal will probably be cited for years to come as a case study in how not to announce a game, but what really got people worked up is what Highguard's developer did next: nothing.

Highguard is launching on Steam next week, but the studio still hasn't said anything new about it publicly, aside from one tweet today announcing a livestream. Starved for a new trailer to dunk on in the endless competition to win the social media Cynicism Cup, posters have had to settle for generic declarations of Highguard's cookedness.

That cynicism-for-cynicism's-sake aside, it feels safe to say that general distrust over this kind of game is at an all-time high. In Highguard's case, you do get a whiff of hubris from the decision not to run any public betas. We've just seen Bungie, a studio with quite a bit of experience releasing multiplayer shooters, take feedback from a Marathon playtest and slowly, cautiously start to turn public perception around on it. But Highguard's just going to drop? You've gotta raise an eyebrow at that.

But I can't fault Highguard's creators for not being actively engaged piñatas. The implication of so many incredulous X posts and YouTube video titles is that it's bizarre, catastrophic, and scandalous that we have not been showered with character trailers, deep dive articles, and developer quotes. The quietude is a little unusual, but lots of games don't get all that, especially self-published games like Highguard.

And some Highguard developers did in fact post on social media after the announcement, with one of them subsequently saying: "Day 1 of being a game dev with a public-facing game and I got 75+ quote retweets personally ripping me apart, simply for being excited to share what I poured myself into for years."

With that kind of response, they may as well just let the game speak for itself. It's not as if there's any actual scandal to respond to here. There's no malfeasance inherent in some former developers of Titanfall 2, Apex Legends, and other popular shooters making another game in that very popular genre.

The Web 2.0 era has lasted long enough that I've nearly forgotten what it was like when silence was the status quo. Back in the day, you didn't hear from game developers except in occasional magazine interviews and fan conventions. They released games, we played them, and then we shouted at each other about them until they released the next one. They weren't required to listen in.

I don't think we're ever headed back to that world, where CEOs didn't beef with each other on X all day or hold Reddit AMAs to quell fan uprisings. For one thing, clamming up just isn't a privilege everyone can enjoy while chasing a living in games today. Niche games aren't automatically going to be noticed, never mind be featured at the end of a big award show, and developers from marginalized backgrounds are routinely subjected to personal attacks and threats for seeking out their audience on social media.

But if you can say screw it and log off, it's hard to fault it. As X in particular becomes less and less tolerable, I wonder if we'll see developers pull back from the 'we hear your feedback' era more often, and just let the shouting take its course.